Notes For Engagement Cards

BREAST CANCER DIAGNOSIS ... WRONG

Cancer is in principle a general problem, which occurs at the point of least resistance.

There are many, too many women affected by the problem e il loro numero cresce, in percentuale, sempre maggiore. Tra il 1968 e il 2002, le cifre sono triplicate (32.000 decessi nel 2002 rispetto agli 8.000 nel 1968). Anche l’aggressività, ovvero la metastatizzazione “immediata”, è cresciuta.

Studi americani hanno recentemente confermato un rischio più elevato di sviluppo del carcinoma mammario in presenza di terapia ormonale (Fonte: Soinger Tageblatt del 13 luglio 2002). Detto in parole molto grossolane, la terapia con estrogeni dà al corpo questo segnale: “Sei incinta”. Il seno, di per sé, comincia quindi a prepararsi per il bambino. L’invio di questo segnale persisted for many years is simply against nature. The breast cells were not paid for this .

In the field of mammography, I would like to present here the declaration of the radiologist specialist unheard of breast cancer, Toni Birtel: "A diagnosis made on two followed by a mammogram is wrong." ( medicalization of life - Dr. Domenighetti).

This is the reason why every year in the Federal Republic of Germany, 150,000 women undergo a mastectomy on the basis of a misdiagnosis . Hundred and fifty thousand women lose a breast because a device is not working properly, or because the doctor does not know how to interpret the images. This was confirmed by the President of Gmunder Ersatzkasse, Dieter Liebel, referring to the committee of experts in the field of health (Source: Rheinische Post, 27.03.2002, "Diagnosis of human cancer: a second opinion").

Zoubek was able to bring complete healing breast cancer posters with lymphatic preparations. In this way, radical surgery with removal of lymph nodes is not only put into question, rather it clarifies once again the value of the sap for healing.

prior removal of the lymph nodes under the arm should be considered an act of desperation. The sap should move to achieve healing.

Misgeld, covering his forty years experience, vehemently opposes the radical intervention of the breast, which brings with it the trauma of the loss of the breast. "The statistics show very clearly that the survival period of ten years is independent of the technical intervention, even radiation therapy increased the survival rate," he writes.

Finally, a "shining light" of copy operation U.S.: some women have still been a mastectomy in 2002 (prior bilateral amputation of the breast) because a genetic test predicted an increased likelihood of breast cancer. (We refer readers to discern the conclusion) .