First start with the digits. Who has listened Berlusconi has felt a bit 'of figures shoot ... He said: "We are all bugged: 150 000 mobile controlled". It then took another math multiplying the 150 x 50, and so arrived at 7 and a half million people, according to her, spied on! These figures are right? No! As often happens lied ...
Meanwhile, we start with the numbers, there's also wrong, because the telephone users in interception in 2009 were 119,000 (you get to 132,000 with environmental record, with camera and GPS measurements ). As you can see are well below the 150,000 that he said (but who's giving them the data Alfano ?? What empirical calculations for instance) cmq the his bad faith does not stop there, because those 150,000 telephones intercepted and its consequences multiplication makes a 'anything that is not right and associated 1 user = phone a citizen. So those 150,000 150,000 telephone users become citizens ... very smart in his lie and confuse the most ...
According to data provided by the sector average is 5.3 users per person. To find the citizens intercepted nel 2009 basta fare una semplice divisione 119.000 (i le reali utenze intercettate ) diviso 5,3 ( utenze medie per persona) e vedrete che uscirà una cifra ben differente da quella sparata da B erlusconi . Grosso modo i cittadini intercettati sono meno di 23.000 e bisogna anche tener conto che in Italia esistono 3 tra le più grandi mafie del mondo e infatti gli intercettamenti telefonici, ma non solo, si concentrano maggiormente in 3 regioni: campania , calabria , Sicily .
Now we move on to another topic with which to succeed menano often and that is ... costs! should say first that in the last 5 years the cost of wiretapping went gradually to decline and this should reassure the detractors of this instrument, but it is not ... then analyze the cost had in 2009. Well, the state spent in 2009 for interceptions of € 276.6 million divided in this way: 214 to companies that provide paid the equipment and the rest telephone operators for printouts and other things. The question is obvious: the state instead of always renting equipment third would not delay to make a profit and buy it cost? They are afraid to save too much? In a couple of years or so you repay all costs incurred!
But the state could even clear the costs and time I'll explain why. Why is the one who grants licenses to operators in the sector without which it could work in our area that is in Italy.
Ora vi faccio un esempio per capirci meglio: facciamo finta che nalla zona in cui abito esista solo un terreno e quel terreno lo possiedo io e un mio amico mi chiede se gli dò la concessione di quel terreno perché vorrebbe avviarci qualcosa che gli farebbe guadagnare molti soldi. Io gli ok, te lo dò in concessione. E così lui inizia a lavorare lì e a fare un sacco di guadagni, mettiamo che tira su un giro di affari di oltre 30.000€ all'anno e mettiamo che io, proprietario del terreno, ogni tanto gli vado a chiedere se mi fa dei piccoli lavoretti, roba da 250/300 € all'anno e questi lavoretti me li fa tutti pagare!
Cosa potrei fare per non pagarli? Semplice, potrei prendere il mio amico in disparte e dirgli: "Tu stai facendo un sacco di soldi con il terreno che ti sto dando in concessione, occhio che la prossima volta potrei dimenticarmi di darti la concessione... E ricordati che ci sono tante altre persone che vorrebbero questa opportunità che oggi tu hai!".
Capito? Spero di aver fatto un esempio lampante su come lo Stato potrebbe rifarsi sugli operatori telefonici.
Poi se ci pensate bene è quello che succede già con le banche. When there is an investigation and a judge wants to hear accounts suspicious movements of money or whatever 'and turns to another bank to find out more this starts to available without paying a cent for committees ... Just apply here the same method!
time for further reflection I conclude: we take the official figures have emerged of people really intercepted , ie less than 23,000 ... but arrotoandiamo for excess stimiamoli and 23,000 in and then multiply it for 50 (which according Berlusconi are the people that we hear in 'period of one year) and you will see that the figure is not at all comparable 7 million and a half Berlusconi, saying that the number he had given, that is 50, I do not know where it comes but I know almost for certain that was calculated to excess ... so if B erusconi said 50 surely is one less ... meditateci on ...
Greetings
0 comments:
Post a Comment